One of the projects I reviewed was Deb's.
My second peer reviewed projects is Oscar's.
The purpose of my project was to give the audience a chance to review both sides of my controversy so they could make an accurate opinion on where they stand. I also wanted to inform my audience that the media can be bias at times and to not always believe just one story from the media. I think that my project was able to display both sides in order for the audience to form their own opinion. I am revising my paper because I think I did not accurately show why the audience should not always listen to the media. I also think that I need to express who my audience is better and I need to improve on showing that this is indeed an argument. As for my project itself, I will increase the length of my project in order to provide more information and accurately address my audience. Since my project relies heavily on appearance, I may need to clean up the slides. Another aspect of my project I need to improve on is displaying both sides of the argument and create more depth in my argument. This means adding more sources and adding more slides about the controversy.
Steven
I really like your reflection! Especially this sentence, "I also wanted to inform my audience that the media can be bias at times and to not always believe just one story from the media." (Duron, 2015) I really like how you explained to us why you wanted to revise your essay. Overall, Good job!
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that you feel that you appealed to your audience the way you wanted. In terms of expressing who your audience is i don't feel is too necessary. As long as you know who your audience is you can pertain to them which is what i feel is needed.
ReplyDelete